Today, speaking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a class of timepieces that's normally used for even ten percent of its potential.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", when the individual has secured his wrist into the maximum after a dip along with a few strokes, then return instantly to couch under the umbrella?
If this is their main use it is only the fault of old habits at least as much as the introduction of the so-called divers of the contemporary age that dates back into the center of the previous century.
The incorrigible need to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three decades later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces the category can boast, was already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist became a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are just two of the first cases that show how - fiction or reality - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day that the manufacturers in regards to describing their versions started to use the term: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 shift, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose function was played with the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their actual use within this massive family whose roots would simply deal with "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to fear even once you need to wash the palms.
But click here a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically speaking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive philosophies of these fascinating references.
I have a long-standing friend who is a professional diver and who, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at large depths.
A True wrist sub Has to Be able to ensure these performances:
Fantastic visibility throughout the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficiency of its movement, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests did not end here: today professional diving watches must adhere to specific rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal usage, that which we know is the best, the best sub could be in the end a watchable to offer features much milder and easier to manage.
I recall this in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but this isn't so when it is done a banal swim in the sea. It would be better to avoid diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely to a screw-on crown better still if protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
And the safety on the watertight status of this submerged timepieces?
Just for people who would never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown isn't completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a blatant state of non-security.
Unfortunately, this really is the principal reason why an abyssal super dip watch might have to be rushed to a service center, prior to seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, but on very few models, which honestly I don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and as a result, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown tightly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver somewhere safe, or obligatorily create a closing but basic check on the trimming of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen together a bit 'of issues linked to the time that has to meet the water, and given the essential information, I reveal you which - at least to date - are for me the best dive watches.
They're here not many: I've split them into two categories. The order in which they appear does not signify any position.